> show folders on top you likely click on a subfolder and never need the > they have and you can see the scrobbars growing - given that they also > other filemanagers like Konqueror on Linux just start to display what > while read further, you get nothing for a long time > LAN because it reads a lot of metadata and not start to fill the view > not only over AFT, SMB the same nad in case of many items also on a GBE > it's Apples finder which is that terrible slow > Content-Type: text/plain charset="windows-1252" > Subject: Re: Netatalk is very slow over slower Superslow? it sometime takes minutes to list a directory with 30 folders. > It is the listing of the folders that is slow. > But when users connect from their home over VPN, and especially if they are not on a 100/100Mbit cabled connection? lets say ADSL or something, the connection is really slow.
#NETATALK SLOW DISCOVERY MAC#
> I have a Ubuntu server running at a client office (only mac users) and connecting to AFP onsite is fast and no problem. > Content-Type: text/plain charset=windows-1252 > Subject: Netatalk is very slow over slower I really would like to stay on the Ubuntu as a server setup…
If you where in my shoes… what would you do? Hope you have time to give me your expert thoughts on this. Is there anything I can do… or should I starta doing a rsync and go back to the mac mini setup?įirst I went with SMB, but that is terribly slow even on site with Gigabit lan network, so I went for Netatalk … which at first seemed like a great choice… until the users started to connect from home. I went from a mac mini server to this setup since I wanted it to be more business (have iLO and things like that), but the users will not accept that it is this slow. I thought Netatalk was partly created so that there was a easy way to share to Macs on linux.
0 kommentar(er)
